A couple of unidentified models for Broactive posing suits, which seem to tightly outline the bodybuilders' bulges suitably (posted by Muscleposer).
8 comments:
Silvio
said...
The first guy has a nice cock, but is striking my most unfavourite and to my mind highly unflattering, but nevertherless much practised, classic BB pose, which I call the pouter pigeon style: all shoulders, biceps and chest above a sucked in waist. And he does not seem to have a great set of abs either. But then, this pose does noallow a guy to make the most of his abs, so I may be wrong abut them.
The second guy is a lot better balanced and has nice muscles everyhwere, but he needs to get himself a better pair of well-cut posers to show of his sex kit to greater advantage; no good hiding his crown jewels, which look as though they might be quite tasty taken both orally and anally.
Aesthetically discriminating, but certainly not "picky" I would say FrankPA!
And if you would like another "picky comment", in both shots, this guy's head looks totally detached and out of proporiton with his body, as he does not appear to have any trapezius muscles. His best feature as far as I am concerned, is his bulge. Who knows, he may be a great cockswain as distinct from coxswain!
Look at the shot of a Santiago Aragon in the right hand shots: the first one below the final comment: Dieter commented .... He is my idea of utter perfection: muscular but not overdone; and his head looks as though it belongs on his body, as it is supported by well proportioned traps - which, being "picky" again - when overdeveloped, as, alas, they often are, ruin an otherwise perfect appearance.
And just get a load of Santiago's cock. From the bulge, my guess is that it's a world beater asdn ta the is a great "cockswain".
So,FrankPA, why not try to be more critically discriminating yourself rather than dismiss a comment on the grounds it is "picky" Try and string a few coherent observations together yourself- if you are capable of that - rather then telling someone who looks carefully at ever picture and offers fans his reasoned appreciation, rather than just saying he is "picky". You do not have to agree with what you read; so, if you are up to the challenge,why not begin by giving us all your appreciation of the guy in question? I look forward to reading your wise words!
They might liven up the general discussion: such as it is, which is exactly what I am endeavorung to do with my comments
Silvo: you are talking about this bodybuilder as if he was Quasimodo. The only problem is the angle that the photo was taken. Not the best, that's true.
As ever, my dear Frank, it's a question of beauty in the eyes of the beholder. Just Google Santiago and look at his gallery. For me this stud is very special. Whom do you dig the most?
8 comments:
The first guy has a nice cock, but is striking my most unfavourite and to my mind highly unflattering, but nevertherless much practised, classic BB pose, which I call the pouter pigeon style: all shoulders, biceps and chest above a sucked in waist. And he does not seem to have a great set of abs either. But then, this pose does noallow a guy to make the most of his abs, so I may be wrong abut them.
The second guy is a lot better balanced and has nice muscles everyhwere, but he needs to get himself a better pair of well-cut posers to show of his sex kit to greater advantage; no good hiding his crown jewels, which look as though they might be quite tasty taken both orally and anally.
Silvio you are so picky! LOL
Aesthetically discriminating, but certainly not "picky" I would say FrankPA!
And if you would like another "picky comment", in both shots, this guy's head looks totally detached and out of proporiton with his body, as he does not appear to have any trapezius muscles. His best feature as far as I am concerned, is his bulge. Who knows, he may be a great cockswain as distinct from coxswain!
Look at the shot of a Santiago Aragon in the right hand shots: the first one below the final comment: Dieter commented .... He is my idea of utter perfection: muscular but not overdone; and his head looks as though it belongs on his body, as it is supported by well proportioned traps - which, being "picky" again - when overdeveloped, as, alas, they often are, ruin an otherwise perfect appearance.
And just get a load of Santiago's cock. From the bulge, my guess is that it's a world beater asdn ta the is a great "cockswain".
So,FrankPA, why not try to be more critically discriminating yourself rather than dismiss a comment on the grounds it is "picky" Try and string a few coherent observations together yourself- if you are capable of that - rather then telling someone who looks carefully at ever picture and offers fans his reasoned appreciation, rather than just saying he is "picky". You do not have to agree with what you read; so, if you are up to the challenge,why not begin by giving us all your appreciation of the guy in question? I look forward to reading your wise words!
They might liven up the general discussion: such as it is, which is exactly what I am endeavorung to do with my comments
Silvo: you are talking about this bodybuilder as if he was Quasimodo. The only problem is the angle that the photo was taken. Not the best, that's true.
Not at all, Frank, I just don't care for this classic pose, whether struck by him or by anyone else.
As for looking like Quasimodo; well he most certainly does not. But since you make the allusion, there are many who do!
So what do you think of my perfect stud: Santiago Aragon? Does he not have a super bulge, which would give most guys a run for their money?
Silvio: I find Santiago hot, but I don't think he is special.
As ever, my dear Frank, it's a question of beauty in the eyes of the beholder. Just Google Santiago and look at his gallery. For me this stud is very special. Whom do you dig the most?
I would like to have sex with the first one!
Post a Comment